In reply to
@NancyL about text overwhelmed with links: Hahaha, that is a great point, it would be a little amusing (but not enormously practical) to have pages of commentary on a single word or sentence in the text. Especially reflecting on our 6-week analysis of "I Sit Beside the Fire and Think" recently, we'd have pages and pages of commentary per line!
[/QUOTE]
Yes! This is exactly the 'problem' (not a problem) our wiki must solve. One link to link them all, one search to find them, one page to show them all, and in the wiki spread them. lol
Categories, tags, anchors, links, static pages with dynamic content, prepopulated searches, etc. All this can be drilled down from one tagged phrase or word in the original document, or (if we use a write once, deploy many model) in repeatedly called iterations of the same text. So, the first time you see the text it has normal links with the biggest categories tagged in the text, and an expandable menu of more links and topics in a sidebar, and a search for content referencing this passage in a dedicated search tool, and a TOC of original media related to that passage/slide/commentary (including category articles, topic starters, video and audio from the series, etc.), It is only when you follow one of the TOC items or the sidebar menu items that you begin to see additional in-text links related to the kind of search you followed (if you followed a location and setting link you won't see a theology link, for instance). The breadcrumbs should lead anyone back to the original article or text to follow the other options.
In the case of 'I Sit Beside the Fire and Think' an entire section page should be made and dedicated to showcasing the main categories, the list of episodes, the articles, commentary, current discussion, etc.
