Tony Meade
Active Member
SESSION 145
The great ring of long debate:
The great ring of long debate:
- What was this debate about? It could be about what happened to the Ring, whether it was found or rolled down to the Sea, or what they should do with it if they find it.
- There could have been much debate prior to the Council, or at the untold beginning of the debate, but there haven’t been any debates that we’ve seen, only stories and revelations.
- There will be some debate later in the Council, but this cannot be to what Galdor is referring.
- It seems as though that this is a subject that those who know about the Rings of Power, this is a long-standing issue and has been discussed for many years among the Wise.
- Could Galdor be speaking lightly, agreeing with Bilbo about the need for a meal break? It’s possible he is teasing the hobbits, though it would be inappropriate at this stage of the Council.
- Frodo has an advantage over the Wise in that he is coming to knowledge of the Ring at the end, after everything that needs to be known about the Ring has already been discovered.
- For Galdor, who is generally knowledgeable, he doesn’t need a full explanation, but rather he needs to have the gaps in his knowledge filled in and to have long-standing questions answered.
- Saruman had attempted to finish these old debates with his answers, but those turned out false.
- Note: As readers, we can take this lore for granted, since it was explained in full in Chapter Two.
- Why didn’t Gandalf use the fire test to prove this is the One Ring, like he did in Bag End? It is not clear yet why, but it may be related to why Elrond doesn’t allow Bilbo to tell the Party story.
- What does Saruman mean by “his hope will cheat him” in reference to Sauron? Sauron has diverted many resources to the finding of the Ring, but that is wasted if the Valar took it away.
- While this may or may not be actually true, Saruman’s true intent is to divert everyone else from looking near the Gladden Fields, which as we learn later is where he himself is searching.
- Saruman may also be making a slip, or more likely that he is expressing the fact that he looked himself and he was unable to find the Ring, so he fully expects Sauron to get the same result.
- Do the allies believe that Sauron is undefeatable without the Ring, and when did they start to believe that? They were able to drive him from Mirkwood, but Gandalf admits this was a ruse.
- Note: The wisdom in Saruman’s words will be played out by Aragorn’s understanding that tempting Sauron with the possibility of recovering the Ring is how he gets him to empty his lands, thus his hope cheats him, but the irony is that hope also cheats Saruman in the end.
- The attacks on Gondor suggest Sauron’s military strength is something which they seem to have underestimated, and the appearance of the Witch-king on the field was unexpected.
- It’s at this point that they start to understand their relative military weakness, but it’s unclear if they are sure at this point that they will lose whether Sauron recovers the Ring or not.
- Note: The idea of Isildur’s heir laboring to repair Isildur’s fault may be part of the angst-ridden version of Aragorn in the films, as he is motivated to avoid repeating Isildur’s mistakes by avoiding his temptations, though in the book is motivated by his resolve to defeat Sauron.
- The fact that Aragorn calls himself Isildur’s heir is different from being his descendant, in that he sees himself as inheriting Isildur’s responsibilities along with the rest of his heritage.
- Aragorn expresses a lack of hope in going on this search, though he places faith in Gandalf. This proves correct in retrospect looking at the situation at the time, even though he succeeds later.
- What does Aragorn mean by Isildur’s fault? Elrond has already told that Isildur should not have kept the Ring but had no speculation as to why he may have done that instead of destroying it.
- Aragorn seems to go further than Elrond in suggesting that Isildur had fallen prey to the Ring.
- The fault that Aragorn specifically means is not destroying the Ring, as they didn’t understand how the Ring worked with regards to Sauron’s return or that how it might affect its bearer.
- It’s not even clear that the Numenorean exiles from knew that Sauron’s body was destroyed during the fall of Númenor, and what they wrote in the Akallabêth was later speculation.
- If they are tracking Gollum in order to gain knowledge to help in the destroying the Ring, then this helps him to repair the fault of not destroying it the first time Isildur had the chance.
- The point of this quest for Gandalf is to settle the question if this is the One Ring, so even though the objective is Gollum, all roads lead back to Isildur.
- Note: Tolkien’s writing of the fact that Isildur wanted to give up the Ring to the Wise was to answer the question as to why the shards of Narsil survived, but not the Ring, though this was written much later after The Lord of the Rings. This intention is only stated in Unfinished Tales, though this intention was never fulfilled, and Gandalf said that others may play with that idea. Isildur’s death was merciful, considering what might have happened to him if he kept the Ring.
- Does Gandalf mean different things by “Mountains of Shadow” and “fences of Mordor”? Gandalf may be making an appositive between the two, or as an explanation of the geography.
- He may also be making a distinction between the geography and the watches on the border.