Bill_the_pony
New Member
I hope this hasn’t been asked yet - for I’m listening to session 182 and wondering about Boromir’s perspective in the end portion of the council. Corey’s just covered Elrond’s “the ring is completely corrosive, even Saruman was good once,” speech.
Could Boromir be hearing the Middle-earth version of “absolute power corrupts absolutely?” If so, he has generations of counterevidence (the stewards): powerful people that have stared an opportunity to take a small step to even greater power and chosen not to take it.
With that in mind, I could see why he’d eventually end up rationalizing that he’d be able to resist the corrosive power of the ring. The sample size of ring bearers is small, and two of them are yet unfallen, so Elrond’s “The thing is entirely evil and cannot be used for good, and will corrupt everyone who bears it” seems a bit shaky. (Bilbo is RIGHT THERE, living, unfallen, having used the ring to fight with the attercops, and still in fine enough fettle to sass Elrond mid-council.)
So why shouldn’t Boromir think Providence brought him and the ring together over such a great distance to give him a weapon? It’s in his bloodline to be the perfect ringlord! Look at this long line of faithful stewards who have not overstepped their power, or strayed from their task and values. All this, despite centuries of having no real reason not to take that final, fateful step. Providence much?
(I’ll admit I’m not confident if Boromir’s line has been Totally Loyal, since I remember little of the Silmarillion and am rusty on the appendices.) Sorry for the wall of text, no formatting, and likely a half-dozen autocorrects; I’m on my phone!
Could Boromir be hearing the Middle-earth version of “absolute power corrupts absolutely?” If so, he has generations of counterevidence (the stewards): powerful people that have stared an opportunity to take a small step to even greater power and chosen not to take it.
With that in mind, I could see why he’d eventually end up rationalizing that he’d be able to resist the corrosive power of the ring. The sample size of ring bearers is small, and two of them are yet unfallen, so Elrond’s “The thing is entirely evil and cannot be used for good, and will corrupt everyone who bears it” seems a bit shaky. (Bilbo is RIGHT THERE, living, unfallen, having used the ring to fight with the attercops, and still in fine enough fettle to sass Elrond mid-council.)
So why shouldn’t Boromir think Providence brought him and the ring together over such a great distance to give him a weapon? It’s in his bloodline to be the perfect ringlord! Look at this long line of faithful stewards who have not overstepped their power, or strayed from their task and values. All this, despite centuries of having no real reason not to take that final, fateful step. Providence much?
(I’ll admit I’m not confident if Boromir’s line has been Totally Loyal, since I remember little of the Silmarillion and am rusty on the appendices.) Sorry for the wall of text, no formatting, and likely a half-dozen autocorrects; I’m on my phone!