Nicholas Palazzo
Well-Known Member
Alright, here is the link for the live feed scheduled for 7:30 PM EST.
Participation link to be announced.
Participation link to be announced.
One way to set up the existence of the Petty Dwarves in this Season would be that when Beleg is making his journey from Sirion to Menegroth and finds the remains of an elf killed by Tevildo, we could have an allusion to inhabitants of the highlands. Either the elves can intentionally avoid the area, or they can pass by some clearly man-made structure that is designed as a 'keep out' message. So, there will be no petty dwarves on screen, but some sort of creepy vibe that the elves find distasteful might make the audience curious about who might live there.
My question is:
How and why does Amrod's ship sink? Telerian ships don't sink even when filled with water. The Feanorians evacuate because they don't know this, but if they purposely scuttle the ship Amrod will surely get the palantir out first.
So it's enough that gross user error cancels out the general unsinkability of Telerian ships.I don't think they are purposely scuttling the ship. The ship capsizes and the Feanorians abandon it. We can even show a shot of the palantir resting on the sea floor. Perhaps with an image of Nerdanel in it.
Ok. Could he just...fall overboard? He could be up in the mast, looking back at Valinor, and fall into the water?
You've still got Fingon and Finrod confused in the first scene.
Not at all convinced, I’m afraid. My experience of sailing is a bit limited but I’d say that before a ship capsizes it lists, and probably during hard wind that would be able to catapult an inexperienced sailor from the top of the mast or at least force him to fall - and the mast would be quite short if it didn’t drop him in the water.The ship would have to be listing quite heavily for that to happen anyway, otherwise he would just fall to the deck. And just falling overboard seems considerably more contrived than bad sailing resulting in a disabled and capsized ship. The idea is that the Feanorians, through poor seamenship, capsize the vessel. Even then, the Teleri would simply right the ship, repair the mast, and continue. The Feanorians don't have any idea how to do those things.
Not at all convinced, I’m afraid. My experience of sailing is a bit limited but I’d say that before a ship capsizes it lists, and probably during hard wind that would be able to catapult an inexperienced sailor from the top of the mast or at least force him to fall - and the mast would be quite short if it didn’t drop him in the water.
A capsizing ship is either dramatic or ridiculous. I assume we’re not going for laughs here, so I guess it will have to be drama - unless you just let it happen, oops, let’s forget about that, just keep going... After all, it’s not just Amrod who falls into the water, it’s a whole lot of elves. So it could be a big thing. But I guess they can swim, because, well, they’re Noldor, so they’re not in any greater danger (or are they?)...so what are we doing, why are we telling this story? It feels out of tune. If you want to mark Amrod as someone who almost dies but is saved, I get that, but it seems that it isn’t dramatic so is he saved from death or not?I've only done a small amount of sailing for someone who grew up on an island two miles from the ocean myself. 🙂
The amount of wind it takes to hurl a person is considerably greater than what is necessary to lean a ship over. We just don't have nearly as much wind resistance in comparison to relative mass as a sail does. My question is why there is resistance to capsizing the ship. We certainly aren't going for drama here, as we are joining this scene in media res and Amras easily rescuing his brother and their crew. The drama comes in afterward.
A capsizing ship is either dramatic or ridiculous. I assume we’re not going for laughs here, so I guess it will have to be drama - unless you just let it happen, oops, let’s forget about that, just keep going... After all, it’s not just Amrod who falls into the water, it’s a whole lot of elves. So it could be a big thing. But I guess they can swim, because, well, they’re Noldor, so they’re not in any greater danger (or are they?)...so what are we doing, why are we telling this story? It feels out of tune. If you want to mark Amrod as someone who almost dies but is saved, I get that, but it seems that it isn’t dramatic so is he saved from death or not?
Well, forgive me for being a bit picky but this idea doesn’t really add anything substantial. I’d much rather have one of the older brothers get fed up with his looking in the palantir so much and throw it into the sea. That would add some in group tension.I think we might be looking at this a bit differently. Having capsized a boat (not a ship, obviously) myself, I know it can happen very quickly if you are inexperienced, but doesn't have to be life-threatening, even in deep water. I have also nearly capsized a sailboat as well. But I think how dramatic it is on screen will be in the editing. If the mast snaps, and the wing sails drive one side under within seconds, and no one is hurt because they are all on deck and jump free, it is not dangerous if they are immediately rescued. We would be able to see the other ships close by, and no that unless someone is trapped belowdecks, it is going to be ok. If we spend a lot of time on it, with building music, it will certainly look more dramatic.
I might film something tonight that will demonstrate what I'm talking about. For example, if I have a shot of me walking slowly up my stairs at home, there is no drama to that. But add creepy music, and a few well placed shots so that the sequence is longer, it adds a significant amount of drama.
Well, forgive me for being a bit picky but this idea doesn’t really add anything substantial. I’d much rather have one of the older brothers get fed up with his looking in the palantir so much and throw it into the sea. That would add some in group tension.
My problem is that it isn’t efficient. I agree that it shows all the things you mention but in my opinion it becomes too much - and too little. I’m also curious why you want to take down the whole ship when you could just let Amrod fall overboard. It feels unnecessary and smudges the significance of the event, if we have to have it. We could also, as I suggested above, have Caranthir (for example) becoming annoyed by Amrod looking into the palantir and then take it from him and throw it into the water. That would establish Amrod’s feelings and also show Caranthir (who could do it ruthlessly or saying his younger brother has to cut the cord, that kind of longing is bad for you).I don't see it as being picky, I've done the same quite often. What is being added is a moment where we can discuss the palantir and how its loss affects Amrod. It gives us a likeable moment for both him and his brother without having to add enmity between Amrod and another of his brothers, as we are going to get plenty of that soon enough. It shows that the Feanorians are poor sailors. It establishes that Amrod wants to go back without Amras knowing exactly what his plans are. It sets up a discussion of the Oath and how the sons of Feanor perceive it.
This seemed to us the most efficient way to get all of those things done, but I'd be willing to consider other options.
My problem is that it isn’t efficient. I agree that it shows all the things you mention but in my opinion it becomes too much - and too little. I’m also curious why you want to take down the whole ship when you could just let Amrod fall overboard. It feels unnecessary and smudges the significance of the event, if we have to have it. We could also, as I suggested above, have Caranthir (for example) becoming annoyed by Amrod looking into the palantir and then take it from him and throw it into the water. That would establish Amrod’s feelings and also show Caranthir (who could do it ruthlessly or saying his younger brother has to cut the cord, that kind of longing is bad for you).
I’m also curious why you want to take down the whole ship when you could just let Amrod fall overboard. It feels unnecessary and smudges the significance of the event, if we have to have it.
We could also, as I suggested above, have Caranthir (for example) becoming annoyed by Amrod looking into the palantir and then take it from him and throw it into the water. That would establish Amrod’s feelings and also show Caranthir (who could do it ruthlessly or saying his younger brother has to cut the cord, that kind of longing is bad for you).