Burned Dwarf
New Member
Hi folks,
I almost posted this after session 3, and after the discussion in session 4 I've decided to add it for those interested.
One of the best historians on the subject of the Inquisition (or more properly inquisitions, since there were several varieties) is Prof. Thomas F. Madden of Saint Louis University. He did one of the Modern Scholar Series courses (also available on Audible) on Heaven or Heresy: A History of the Inquisition. It's well worth the time.
It's probably been a decade since I listen to the course, but I still remember a number of surprising takeaways:
I almost posted this after session 3, and after the discussion in session 4 I've decided to add it for those interested.
One of the best historians on the subject of the Inquisition (or more properly inquisitions, since there were several varieties) is Prof. Thomas F. Madden of Saint Louis University. He did one of the Modern Scholar Series courses (also available on Audible) on Heaven or Heresy: A History of the Inquisition. It's well worth the time.
It's probably been a decade since I listen to the course, but I still remember a number of surprising takeaways:
- Heresy was a civil crime in almost all countries in Europe, under the theory (previously held by the Greeks and Romans) that if you offend God (or the gods) then catastrophes will follow (famine, earthquake, flood, etc.). However, the local civil authority might not know whether your specific believe was actually heretical. So you could be burned at the stake by amateurs for a perfectly orthodox, but obscure, belief.
- Most inquisitors thought of themselves as spiritual doctors, thought they were doing good, and therefore wrote everything down. So we actually know who was accused of what, what the procedure was, and what the punishment was. As is turns out, a lot fewer people were executed (and then by the civil authorities) than is commonly believed. The records are actually incredibly good for the time period. And the most common punishments were much less severe than execution.
- The most common contemporary complaint about inquisitors was not that they were too harsh or unfair, but that they were too lenient! The most of the horrible tales we have about the Inquisition are from the Enlightenment or from Victorian novelists who always needed a good villain.
- The Spanish Inquisition is something of a special case. It happened at the height of Spain's power and influence, so the Crown had much more control over it than in most of the rest of Europe. And it's focus on conversos (Muslims and Jews how had converted to Christianity, but privately retained old beliefs and practices) which were a particular concern during and after the Reconquista. Therefore, the inquisitors referenced in The Name of the Rose are not associated with the Spanish Inquisition.