Rob, that may have been your argument, but Odola's argument was the one I was referring to, and it's clearly that simply using medicine is "objectively good". (Also, apparently, that Beauty is objectively good, which makes even less sense.)
You continue to simply assert that healing is objectively good without proving it, and you continue to ignore my argument refuting this assertion. How do you reconcile the idea of "health is objectively Good in a moral sense" with the fact that many "Good" folk (including the Valar and even Ilúvatar himself) intentionally injure or kill others?
In ME:
1. Eru is a the giver, originator and owner of life and as such authorised to take/withdraw it.
2. Fighting and killing is never good in itself, but can be used in self-defence, to defend others, to contain evil, or to serve as punishment. The killing is not the primary goal but the means to permanently remove a danger or establishing justice by punishment.
3. Illness, injury and sickness are always effects of evil/corruption. They can be used "for greater glory", as anything can, but are bad in itself.
4. Restoring health is always good, even in a criminal sentenced to death few hours from now.
5. Restoring health is good even when the patient does not want/wish it - Eowyn - or even actively fights againts it - Theoden (force-healed by Gandalf).
Point 5 demontrates that in LOTR healing is good in itself, regardless of cicumstances.